Start/Know

What are mind maps

You can't desire what you don't even know exists!

First things first

Let's see four ways to represent the same set of information, in this case the things to be provided for a barbecue.

BARBECUE IN SPEECH FORMAT (PROSE):

"For the barbecue we will need sound and CDs, guitar and the music notebook, a deck of cards, paddleball and ball, plus things to serve: plates, cutlery, glasses, napkins, toothpicks. Also don't forget to bring tables and chairs, if you don't have them there."

BARBECUE AS A LIST OF ITEMS:

For the BBQ:

• Cymbals
• Cutlery
• Cups
• Napkins
• Sticks
• Tables
• Chairs
• Sound
• Cds
• Guitar
• Song notebook
• Deck
• Frescobol
• Ball

BARBECUE ON A MIND MAP, NOT ILLUSTRATED:

BARBECUE IN ILLUSTRATED MIND MAP (partially):

Characterization

Mind maps are essentially hierarchical (tree) diagrams that represent information and knowledge in a way:

• textual, illustrated, or both
• synthetic
• organized and leveled

How to "read" a mind map

Some people "find it strange" to a mental map when they see it for the first time, which is due to the way they look at it and (try) to understand it. Just as we don't look at a text as a whole, but read one word or passage at a time, the best way to understand a new mind map for us is to read one topic at a time, starting at the root.

The pace at which this is done depends on our knowledge of the content and consequently on the response time of understanding: familiar issues are recognized more quickly, while new or lesser-known topics require more dedication to each component.

When you first look at a mind map, also check if there is any sequence in the topics. If the map is facing one way, it will be from top to bottom. If it is radial, typically the first topic will be above the right side, running clockwise.

 

In the mind map below, note the following:

• A mind map is made up of topics linked by lines.
• Each topic can contain text, an illustration, or both.
• There is a central topic, also called title or root, which has subtopics connected to the root topic by the lines. Each subtopic in turn can have its own subtopics, resulting in a hierarchical or tree organization.
• The topic hierarchy defines levels with increasing degrees of detail and specificity: the central topic is the most generic, and the sheets are more specific. Formatting often supports this organization: lines get thinner and fonts smaller. The following figure shows a visualization of the levels.

Also note:

• The minimization of prepositions, articles and other linguistic symbols for syntactic purposes only and not essential for comprehension.
• The categorization or grouping of ideas into blocks ("To serve", "Diversions"), which define an organization and levels of ideas, allowing the contextualization of thought and preserving relationships with the rest.

Now do a test. Think barbecue, then planning a barbecue: what would you rather keep in mind? Of the four ways, which is the most comfortable, perhaps the most fluid, for you to think about barbecue planning?

Ways of making

Mind maps can be made in two ways: by hand or in software. Handmade, it can be from a quick sketch of some notes to colorful and neat, as in the examples below.

(br.pinterest.com)

(www.meistertask.com)

There are several mind mapping software on the market, each with its own style. The following mind map was made in Coggle.

(https://coggle.it)

The barbecue mind maps were made in EasyMapper.

Some apps try to get closer to the classic style of hand-drawn mind maps, like the one in the following picture.

It is usually possible to recognize in which program a mind map was made just by the style.

The differences between writing on paper and in software are analogous to writing on paper or using a word processor: the ease and flexibility of change are generally greater, in addition to the greater ease of reproduction. "In general" because the criteria may vary according to the type of mind map: there are some with art characteristics (figure below, from the book The Mind Map Book) and that cannot be easily done in software.

But there are arguments and objections to either form of elaboration. On this, see the section When not to use mind maps.

More examples

For you to further enrich your "mental model" about what mind maps are and what they are for, let's show you some examples in different contexts. Due to space limitations, the content of each mind map in some cases is partial. The examples aim to have familiar content, so you can focus more on the structure and don't have to devote a lot of conscious attention to understanding.

Basic questions

Asking is a way of provoking the mind to seek answers. By putting the six basic questions together, we can have a better understanding and perspective on a situation.

When we have something to do, we can start from that mind map by inserting answers into each branch, each answer as a subtopic.

Syllabus

Every product or work involving information, such as video, article, book, lecture and lecture, course or discipline, thesis, dissertation and monograph, has a content. This content usually has a central idea and details of that idea, in the form of language or discourse. If we ask what the content "talks about", the answer will be in the form of topics related to the central idea.

For example, this work has as its central idea to decide on mind maps, and for this it talks about what and how mind maps are, provides examples, tells cases, leads to the first experiences and others. The other elements detail these topics.

This central idea, its subtopics, and their subtopics form a structure, more specifically a hierarchy. As mind maps are hierarchical, this structure can be worked on a mind map, in two senses: mapping the structure of an existing work or defining the structure of a new work, for later detailing.

This structure is called syllabus. It is more used in teaching, in courses and disciplines, but in fact any work that has a content can have its structure explained as a syllabus.

One of its formats is as below. We've seen some just as lists without organization and others without line breaks.

Syllabus – Mathematics (partial)

1. Sets

1.1. Representation and relationship: pertinence, inclusion and equality.

1.2. Sets: Operations of union, intersection, difference, complementary and Cartesian product.

1.3. Numerical Sets and Operations: Natural, Integer, Rational, Irrational and Real.

2. Functions

2.1. Definition of function, domain, image, graphs, growth and degrowth.

2.2. Functions: polynomial, modular, rational, exponential and logarithmic.

2.3. Progressions: Arithmetic Progressions and Geometric Progressions.

See below a representation of this same syllabus in a mind map:

In addition to facilitating the visualization of the outline, this format, worked in software, results in great productivity, particularly in the elaboration, when the structure usually goes through many changes until its stabilization.

English rules for time notation

The English language has many rules, and being able to consult them quickly increases learning productivity. If they are synthesized and with representative examples, even better. The mind map below is just a possibility.

Compare studying these rules in a textbook or in a mind map.

Geography

The mental map below describes two of the six Brazilian morphoclimatic domains.

This is a case where a table structure has been represented in a mind map: each branch corresponds to a row in the table, and the columns are repeated on each branch.

Revenue

Cooking recipes are often presented in a semi-structured format, which often prioritizes reducing the footprint rather than readability and understanding. See how an omelet recipe looks in a mind map (my recipe…).

In this format, a cooking recipe represented in a mind map is much easier to follow, especially for those who don't have much experience. First, you check what resources you will need. Then, the ingredients. Having everything you need, just follow the preparation instructions.

The green triangle indicates that the topic is contracted, that is, it has subtopics of drill-down not shown.