Craft

Organizing ideas in mind maps

Organize your thinking and improve the quality of your mind maps

The problem

Look at the mind map below, about air and water

www.mindmapping.com

. I'm going to work with the version below.

When we read a new mind map to us, we typically read the central topic, which provides the context for the others, and then we read other topics. When I read the topic Composition, my first understanding was that it referred to the composition of water and air, the context. But I felt the so-called cognitive dissonance, or confusion: the topic didn't align with the title, one wasn't consistent with the other.

It took me some time to identify that there was a quality issue in the mind map. The title is Air and water, there is a main topic for water but not for air.

The topic Water has two subtopics and it is clear that Impurities and Purification refer to water, but what about Composition and Atmosphere? Assuming that they refer to air and inserting a main topic for this, we have:

 

To organize things we typically have a structure and elements inserted or embedded in the structure. For example, your wardrobe has a structure of compartments and you put what you have in the compartments: social, sports, work and underwear, shoes, socks, accessories.

www.marinanaves.com.br

When a compartment is shared, you define virtual compartments or sectors: pants sector, dress sector, shirt sector, and so on.

The main principle of quality of an organization is "a place for everything, each thing in its place". The mind map does not have a place for everything and therefore has things out of its place. The result might be confusion in the understanding of those who read.

Principle No. 1 of organization: a place for each thing, each thing in its place.

By the way, you may notice that the wardrobe pictured above has some violations of this principle with regards to shoes.

The example mind map has other issues of organization quality; I mentioned only this one to introduce an important problem that occurs with hierarchical structures in general and mind maps in particular. Resolving these issues is not obvious, in particular because, as far as I know, there is not much instruction about it.

The purpose here is exactly to provide this instruction, in the form of distinctions that will enable you to see the anomalies of organization and correct them, thus preventing confusion in the readers of your mind maps.

You will also see how organization is essential to increase the power of thought, in the sense of being able to process more information in an integrated way. Let's start with a huge modern problem: the information overloads we have to deal with.

The excess of information

Often you come across a lot of things of some kind. For instance:

- You may have too many clothes.

- On your computer's disk, there are hundreds of thousands of files, of which perhaps thousands are yours.

- In your WhatsApp and/or mail program, thousands of messages, there may be thousands more if you have a mail account at work.

(belicosa.com.br)

- In the supermarket, thousands of items, of which you eventually buy dozens.

- In a search result, sometimes thousands and even millions of pages.

In addition, when performing certain activities, you may also be exposed and have to deal with a large amount of ideas:

- By attending a class, the teacher can introduce many new concepts.

- When preparing a Capstone, you will have dozens of references, whether websites or works, which when read produce hundreds or thousands of ideas that you have to work with to achieve your goal.

- If you exercise some leadership, you may be dealing with a multiplicity of objectives, people, resources, activities and other elements, which you must coordinate so that things work minimally well.

Limits

If we had absolute memory, fine: we would survey things and think about what was necessary without needing anything else. But this is not normal or expected; The fact is that we have limits to what we can remember and think at a given moment. We can easily remember three items that we have to buy, but not 100.

Obvious fact: our memory has limits!

These limits generate the risk of forgetting, more precisely of not remembering: something is important and is in our memory, but we do not remember it at the moment when it would be appropriate or opportune.

It is one thing to know, another to remember at the opportunity.

In addition, most of our information processing is subconscious; Typically, we learn to use later. When we are learning, we have to process new information more consciously, and the limit for this is stricter.

When this limit is exceeded, we enter the so-called overload, and from then on it is more difficult to process any novelty. Our teaching, as far as I know, does not work much on this aspect; I imagine you already have experiences of overload when attending classes.

Options

We have a few options for dealing with information overload. One is to filter information by relevance: of everything we receive, only a part is relevant to what we are doing and should be considered.

Another option is prioritization: among what is relevant, we assess that some information is more important than others and consider it first.

A third option is organization: we define blocks of information so that we can treat them separately. This is the scope of this article.

Organizing ideas

In the case of concrete things, such as clothes, what we do is group the objects according to certain criteria and store them accordingly. For instance:

• Dress clothes
• Sportswear
• Underwear
• Work clothes
• Shoes (day-to-day, party...)

This is what is commonly called organizing things. In addition to clothes, you already organize other things:

• files on your computer
• messages (bookmarking a message is an act of organization)

To organize things, we use ideas such as "social clothes", "Biological Sciences", "Music", "Videos". A book will have parts, chapters and sections as elements of organization, each with its own name. A newspaper will have notebooks and sections, also with their names.

Each of these ideas that represents the whole is called an organizing idea. When you refer to "my clothes", "my shirts", my messages", you are using an organizing idea, you are dealing with concrete things as a whole.

Organizing ideas thus have a set structure: a container with a content, which are the elements (figure). The set has a name, which defines a criterion for proper insertion of elements. For example, a planet can be properly inserted in the "Planets" and "Cosmic objects" sets, but they do not fit in the "Plants" or "My things" sets. The name is a synthesis of the characteristics that the elements have in common.

Organizing ideas are sets: an idea groups other ideas.

They don't exist but they are useful

Organizing ideas are abstract, that is, they do not exist in physical reality, one cannot see, feel, hear, or pick them up. However, there is a good analogy with things from this reality.

In everyday life we use certain objects to group others, such as a clip, a box, a bag, a package. These organizing objects are analogous to organizing ideas; the difference is that organizing ideas exist only in the mind. Based on this analogy, you can think of organizing ideas as clip ideas or box ideas.

Organizing ideas and memory

An organizing idea has an interesting effect on the use of our memory. In general, words and other symbols function as access clues; for example, if I say "Your house," the immediate effect is that you remember where you live; that's part of the meaning of the term to you.

By the way, the "no" makes no difference here. For example, "don't think of your house" results in you thinking of it the same way, because the presence of the clue is the determining factor. In this sense, commands such as "think" or "imagine" are not necessary either: "your house" is enough!

An organizing idea is a clue that potentially attracts several other ideas; for example, to understand "The songs on your computer", you think about your computer, the place or places where you keep music files and then the files, and you can even mentally "play" some of them.

An organizing idea directs our memory.

If there are many organized ideas, of course, not all of them will come. Test this effect by observing what comes to your mind to understand the term "My favorite dishes." And with "Decisive People in My History"?

In addition, we can think with blocks of ideas and even make decisions, such as opening an "auto parts" or "underwear" store.

We can think and make decisions using an organizing idea.

This mechanism of access to memory can retrieve memorized information, but it also has a dynamic: on one occasion certain ideas come, on the next one others may come. If you keep searching for information, you can also find more.

Ratings

Organizing ideas often occur in groups. For example, organizing your clothes requires several organizing ideas, such as "social," "sporty," "work," "intimate." The same applies to your files, emails, books, and dishes.

A set of related organizing ideas is called a classification. Science elaborates classifications to deal with large quantities, such as the classification of living beings. The sections of a website constitute a classification of its content. You have ratings on your wardrobes, your bookshelves, your desk, your computer. The periodic table of the elements is a good example of classification:

Multiple levels

Ratings can have multiple levels. A men's clothing wardrobe, for example, may have the "Shirts", "Pants" and "Suits" subclasses in the "Social clothes" class.

The classification of living beings has numerous levels. Mathematics has, for example, algebra and geometry; it has analytic, plane and spatial geometry.

The analogy with objects also applies to classification; A bookcase, for example, in addition to compartments, can have one of these closed, with drawers and other compartments. You may have a desk with drawers, and each drawer has areas that constitute a classification. Ok, some drawers only have the class "Several"...

Being groups or sets of elements, classifications also have a structure. This is usually hierarchical, such as the classification of living beings and the folders on a hard drive, but there are other structures, such as the periodic table of elements.

A hierarchical structure has the desirable aspect of only having "down" connections, that is, it has no cycles or systemic connections that increase the complexity of the structure and thus make it more difficult to think about it.

Classifications and memory

We have seen above that organizing ideas function as clues to access memory. Being classifications sets of organizing ideas, when we use one, the memory will be accessed by the set, and we will use the structure of ideas as a guide to locate information.

For example, suppose you want to listen to a certain song, which is in a file and you have no bookmark or list that includes it. You'll probably start from the My Documents folder, think of the My Music folder or wherever they are, and then look for the file by the beginning of the name. If there are subfolders with the name of each musician or band – an additional level in sorting – you use the name to further filter the search. Of course, if you know the name.

Organization anomalies

There are several important issues related to the elaboration of classifications. First, the same set of elements can be classified in several ways; Which is better?

In addition, a rating can have higher or lower quality. For instance:

• Classification may not have room for all elements
• An element may eventually be classified into more than one group.

Problems in rankings constitute organizational anomalies, which result in uncertainty and confusion in the reader's mind. For example, a white outfit can be classified as social or work: when it's time to pick it up, where is it? One website I saw had two sections: Ecology and Environment; There seems to be an intersection of ideas, and readers may have difficulty both looking for something and remembering where something they read was.

Organizing ideas and mind maps

Mind maps represent information and knowledge, and so are subject to many topics. It is then advisable to organize them, either by grouping topics with an organizing idea, or by elaborating a classification for the whole content.

Many classifications are hierarchical; As mind maps also have a hierarchical structure, mind maps constitute a natural resource to represent and work with classifications with this tree structure.

An example. The figure below shows an excerpt from a mind map of possibilities for sensory pleasure. Note that the title represents an organizing idea, as do the topics in level 1 and the subtopics in the topic "Tastes".

This mind map is in fact a part of another, which includes the pleasures we can feel, which, in addition to the gustatory, can include emotional, such as joy, and subjective, such as winning and completing a task (mind map below).

Mind maps allow the mapper to think and work productively on hierarchical classifications and for the reader to quickly retrieve the meanings associated with the mind map.

Mind maps are structurally perfect for working on hierarchical structures.

In passing, check an effect of the organizing ideas mentioned earlier. Look at a topic – for example, "Olfactory" – and notice how it stimulates you to access your memory.

In this way, working on the organization of ideas becomes an important activity in the process of making mind maps. At some point we may have to insert organizing ideas or revise them if they already exist.

In addition, all issues of quality of organizing ideas can occur in mind maps: a low-quality rating will confuse the reader and make it difficult to remember its content, understand and use the mind map.

In fact, the risks of not considering the organization of ideas even include going in the opposite direction of one of the purposes of mind maps, which is to summarize and structure content in order to facilitate and give productivity to the assimilation and use of this content.

Application

Let's make a critical reading of a mind map from the beginning (reproduced below) in the light and from the perspective of the organization.

An anomaly already mentioned is the lack of an entire branch for "Air", with an added effect of shifting what would be your items up and characterizing another anomaly of items at the wrong level.

Now consider the picture where it says "CO2": what topic does it refer to? It should indeed be on the topic of Carbon dioxide. This is an example of illustration organization anomalies.

Questioning - There are cases in which we do not detect an anomaly, we just question it. For example, why is the title/context of the mind map "Air and Water"? There is nothing that connects them that justifies this organization. Evidence of this is that this mind map could be partitioned into two, one for water and one for air, without loss of information.

Finding answers to questions about a mind map often depends on knowing who your target audience is and what it will be used for.

Using Structure Templates

Setting a quality rating from scratch can be very time-consuming. Thus, something that can greatly speed up the elaboration of a mind map is to find a ready-made classification or at least close to the desired one.

For example, the mind map below is a possible classification of the information relevant to a leader. Consider what it would be like to get to this rank – or any other – without any starting point. If you are an experienced leader, you may arrive faster, but usually those who need to structure themselves are the beginners, who as a rule do not have enough content to be classified – at the time when they need it most.

So all we can want most as mappers is to find a good classification to use in the organizing levels of a mind map.

Possibility: to start from an existing classification.

It was based on this idea that I wrote an e-book called Models and Methods for Using Mind Maps (in Portuguese): providing models for the structure of organizing ideas so that a mapper has a starting point much closer to the destination.

And since organizing ideas not only block ideas but also attract them, a structure model also facilitates the retrieval of content, stimulating your thinking in the direction of retrieving information of the type of organizing ideas of the structure.

Check this out by reading the organizing ideas below and noting what they evoke in you:

• My favorite pleasures
• My best vacation
• My Experiences of Making Lemons with Lemonades

Summary

The following is a mind map summarizing the content of this article.

Click here to download the mind map in PDF (158 kB).

Click here to download the original mind map (easyx format, 4 kB)